A Nightmare on Elm Street was first released in 1984, the film’s villain Freddy Krueger struck fear in audiences around the nation. It contained an original story that hadn’t been seen before and a new kind of villain that could physically torture and kill you in your dreams. Director Wes Craven was genius to bring this new twist of horror to life. Not to mention Robert Englund made a very terrifying Freddy Krueger. What made the original so terrifying is that we’d never seen a villain like Freddy before. When we think of sleeping, we think of being at peace, a time to ultimately relax and let go of all of our worries. However, this film takes that away from us. Craven took a peaceful function of the human body and made it a place to be feared. On top of that, “Nightmare” also presented a cast of relatable characters, as well as a compellingly complex villain in Freddy. [caption id="attachment_1347" align="alignleft" width="350"] The “Nightmare” Reboot[/caption] The remake was a semi-faithful adaptation in the visual sense, but it tried to tie up loose ends that might not have been made clear in the original. In other words, there was an abundance of exposition. Exposition is good; over-exposition is bad. The story behind Freddy in the original is that he was a child rapist whom parents of the town hunted down. In this case, it was Nancy’s mom describing to us what had happened, which explains why Freddy is trying to kill Nancy (our heroine). However, it is not made clear why he is killing her friends. The remake takes it one step further by trying to connect all of the characters in order to explain why Freddy wants to kill them all. Here is where the reboot fails. It tries to take an original story and add so much that it ends up getting muddy. There is no sense of mystery. In the original, Freddy’s face is kept mostly in the shadows until the end of the film. This makes Freddy’s character all the more frightening. There’s something truly terrifying in not knowing what you’re being chased by. However, in the remake, Freddy is completely exposed. There is no attempt to hide his mangled features in order to taunt the audience. Not to mention the “new” Freddy did not look nearly as frightening. He looked far more like an animal. All in all, while the reboot may not have been quite as bad as one might have expected, with a mostly-entertaining cast and an interesting style, the original trumps it in the most important category (i.e. being a scary horror movie).]]>
- Chinatown – Dissecting the ScreenplayIn Featured Story, Nonfiction, ReadIn what a lesser film would treat as a forgettably functional, utilitarian scene in service of the next story beat, Towne infuses with situational humor, interpersonal politics, colorful character beats and mundane yet identifiable and immediately relatable stakes--on top of a stirring cornerstone revelation.
- The Valley by Alfred SearlsIn Fiction, Issue No 5, Read
- Prayer Therapy by Marisa WhitneyIn Fiction, Issue No 5, Read
- An Amazon’s Tale, Part Three by Dick YaegerIn Fiction, Issue No 5, Read
- Anomaly, Part Three by Jennifer MilneIn Fiction, Issue No 5, Read